lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:47:30 +0200
From:   Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Swapnil Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, mparab@...ence.com, s-vadapalli@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: phy: cadence-torrent: Add a separate
 compatible for TI J7200



On 24/07/2023 20:56, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Swapnil Jakhade wrote:
>> TI J7200 uses Torrent SD0805 version which is a special version
>> derived from SD0801 that has an additional input reference clock.
>> Add a separate compatible for TI J7200 platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swapnil Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
>> index ddb86ee0cebf..e3a1efd61033 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
>>    compatible:
>>      enum:
>>        - cdns,torrent-phy
>> +      - ti,j7200-serdes-10g
>>        - ti,j721e-serdes-10g
> 
> Should the number of clocks not be restricted dynamically based on the
> compatible, since only the 7200 requires the extra refclk?
> 

Yes, this is a good idea.

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ