lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2e7daff1e314d927cc4b4713afa31ac25787825.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:40:18 -0800
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ligang.bdlg@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] padata: dispatch works on different nodes


>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(pw, &works, pw_list)
> -		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &pw->pw_work);
> +		if (job->numa_aware)
> +			queue_work_node((++nid % num_node_state(N_MEMORY)),

The nid may fall on a NUMA node with only memory but no CPU.  In that case you
may still put the work on the unbound queue. You could end up on one CPU node for work
from all memory nodes without CPU. Is this what you want?  Or you would
like to spread them between CPU nodes?

Tim

> +					system_unbound_wq, &pw->pw_work);
> +		else
> +			queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &pw->pw_work);
>  
>  	/* Use the current thread, which saves starting a workqueue worker. */
>  	padata_work_init(&my_work, padata_mt_helper, &ps, PADATA_WORK_ONSTACK);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists