linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dax: add a sysfs knob to control memmap_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:40:57 +0000
From:   "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
To:     "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC:     "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dax: add a sysfs knob to control memmap_on_memory
 behavior

On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 08:30 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com> writes:
> 
> > Add a sysfs knob for dax devices to control the memmap_on_memory setting
> > if the dax device were to be hotplugged as system memory.
> > 
> > The default memmap_on_memory setting for dax devices originating via
> > pmem or hmem is set to 'false' - i.e. no memmap_on_memory semantics, to
> > preserve legacy behavior. For dax devices via CXL, the default is on.
> > The sysfs control allows the administrator to override the above
> > defaults if needed.
> > 
> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> > Tested-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dax/bus.c                       | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-dax | 17 ++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
> > index 1ff1ab5fa105..2871e5188f0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
> > @@ -1270,6 +1270,52 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_show(struct device *dev,
> >  }
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(numa_node);
> >  
> > +static ssize_t memmap_on_memory_show(struct device *dev,
> > +                                    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +       struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> > +
> > +       return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_dax->memmap_on_memory);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t memmap_on_memory_store(struct device *dev,
> > +                                     struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +                                     const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > +       struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver;
> > +       struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> > +       struct dax_region *dax_region = dev_dax->region;
> > +       struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv = to_dax_drv(drv);
> > +       ssize_t rc;
> > +       bool val;
> > +
> > +       rc = kstrtobool(buf, &val);
> > +       if (rc)
> > +               return rc;
> > +
> > +       if (dev_dax->memmap_on_memory == val)
> > +               return len;
> > +
> > +       device_lock(dax_region->dev);
> > +       if (!dax_region->dev->driver) {
> > +               device_unlock(dax_region->dev);
> > +               return -ENXIO;
> > +       }
> 
> I think that it should be OK to write to "memmap_on_memory" if no driver
> is bound to the device.  We just need to avoid to write to it when kmem
> driver is bound.

Oh this is just a check on the region driver, not for a dax driver
being bound to the device. It's the same as what things like
align_store(), size_store() etc. do for dax device reconfiguration.

That said, it might be okay to remove this check, as this operation
doesn't change any attributes of the dax region (the other interfaces I
mentioned above can affect regions, so we want to lock the region
device). If removing the check, we'd drop the region lock acquisition
as well.

Dan, any thoughts on this?