linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/13] btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231212-btrfs_map_block-cleanup-v1-6-b2d954d9a55b@wdc.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 04:38:04 -0800
From:   Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
To:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/13] btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID10

Now that we have a container for the I/O geometry that has all the needed
information for the block mappings of RAID10, factor out a helper calculating
this information.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b0a5c53fba51..9090bfc4fe38 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6408,6 +6408,35 @@ static void map_blocks_for_dup(struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
 	io_geom->mirror_num = 1;
 }
 
+static void map_blocks_for_raid10(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				  struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
+				  enum btrfs_map_op op,
+				  struct btrfs_io_geometry *io_geom,
+				  int replace)
+{
+	u32 factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes;
+	int old_stripe_index;
+
+	io_geom->stripe_index =
+		(io_geom->stripe_nr % factor) * map->sub_stripes;
+	io_geom->stripe_nr /= factor;
+
+	if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ) {
+		io_geom->num_stripes = map->sub_stripes;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (io_geom->mirror_num) {
+		io_geom->stripe_index += io_geom->mirror_num - 1;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	old_stripe_index = io_geom->stripe_index;
+	io_geom->stripe_index =
+		find_live_mirror(fs_info, map, io_geom->stripe_index, replace);
+	io_geom->mirror_num = io_geom->stripe_index - old_stripe_index + 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * Map one logical range to one or more physical ranges.
  *
@@ -6500,23 +6529,8 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
 	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) {
 		map_blocks_for_dup(map, op, &io_geom);
 	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) {
-		u32 factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes;
-
-		io_geom.stripe_index = (io_geom.stripe_nr % factor) * map->sub_stripes;
-		io_geom.stripe_nr /= factor;
-
-		if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ)
-			io_geom.num_stripes = map->sub_stripes;
-		else if (io_geom.mirror_num)
-			io_geom.stripe_index += io_geom.mirror_num - 1;
-		else {
-			int old_stripe_index = io_geom.stripe_index;
-			io_geom.stripe_index = find_live_mirror(fs_info, map,
-					      io_geom.stripe_index,
-					      dev_replace_is_ongoing);
-			io_geom.mirror_num = io_geom.stripe_index - old_stripe_index + 1;
-		}
-
+		map_blocks_for_raid10(fs_info, map, op, &io_geom,
+				      dev_replace_is_ongoing);
 	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
 		if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ || io_geom.mirror_num > 1) {
 			/*

-- 
2.43.0