[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <432338.1702481544@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:32:24 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/59] netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> 1. Are there known userland tools that rely on this path? I suppose
> this is harmless either way though, and /proc is supposedly part
> of the ABI.
I know various people have sent copies of the file in case of crashes, so it
feels like it should still be accessible by the old path.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists