[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daa14201-2027-4732-bbea-acbb2675e4b8@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:21:36 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@....com,
shubhrajyoti.datta@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Levinsky, Ben" <ben.levinsky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mailbox: add Versal IPI bindings
On 13/12/2023 17:18, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>
>> I don't understand why this change is here. Previously you did not have
>> MMIO address space? If yes, then where do you restrict the old device to
>> disallow these?
>
>
> Hardware description is different between ZynqMP and Versal. And so, we have to design
>
> new bindings for Versal. reg and reg-names for parent node, is only available for new devices.
>
> The new device is checked with compatible string after "required" section.
Hm? What does that mean?
>
> Should I add "unevaluatedProperties: false" after "additionalProperties: false" for parent node below [1] ?
No, you should disallow reg/reg-names for older device.
...
>
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: Host agent request message buffer
>>> + - description: Host agent response message buffer
>>> + - description: Remote agent request message buffer
>>> + - description: Remote agent response message buffer
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: local_request_region
>>> + - const: local_response_region
>>> + - const: remote_request_region
>>> + - const: remote_response_region
>>> + else:
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: Remote IPI agent control register
>>> + - description: Remote IPI agent optional message buffer
>>
>> Were these described in old binding? If not, it's a separate change.
>
> Okay, so I will split this in two patches:
>
> 1) Clean up current bindings (like remove redundant descriptino, sort "required" property order etc..)
If you want to combine cleanup and functional changes, then this would
be two patches.
>
> 2) Add versal platforms bindings doc. (This will add if else cases and Versal platform support)
>
>
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: ctrl
>>> + - const: msg
>>
>> Blank line
>>
>>> required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - - interrupts
>>> - '#address-cells'
>>> - '#size-cells'
>>> + - interrupts
>>
>> Separate change with its own rationale. Trivial cleanups can be
>> organized in one patch, but should not be mixed with adding new devices.
>
> Ack
>
>
>>> - xlnx,ipi-id
>>>
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - if:
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + contains:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - xlnx,versal-ipi-mailbox
>>> + then:
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: Host IPI agent control registers
>>> + - description: Host IPI agent optional message buffers
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: ctrl
>>> + - const: msg
>>> +
>>> + required:
>>> + - reg
>>> + - reg-names
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>
> [1] Here, if I add unevaluatedProperties: false then is it enough for old device to disallow
No, you need reg:false
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists