[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXnexTxt3JE8mEMV@dschatzberg-fedora-PF3DHTBV>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:41:41 -0500
From: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
To: Huan Yang <11133793@...o.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Huan Yang <link@...o.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Yue Zhao <findns94@...il.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mm: add defines for min/max swappiness
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Huan Yang wrote:
>
> 在 2023/12/13 9:38, Dan Schatzberg 写道:
> > [????????? schatzberg.dan@...il.com ????????? https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,????????????]
> >
> > We use the constants 0 and 200 in a few places in the mm code when
> > referring to the min and max swappiness. This patch adds MIN_SWAPPINESS
> > and MAX_SWAPPINESS #defines to improve clarity. There are no functional
> > changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/swap.h | 2 ++
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index f6dd6575b905..e2ab76c25b4a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> >
> > #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
> > #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
> > +#define MIN_SWAPPINESS 0
> > +#define MAX_SWAPPINESS 200
>
> Do MAX_SWAPPINESS apply for all swapppiness? If so, maybe better change
> swappiness sysctl define:
> ```
> sysctl.c:
>
> {
> .procname = "swappiness",
> .data = &vm_swappiness,
> .maxlen = sizeof(vm_swappiness),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> .extra2 = SYSCTL_TWO_HUNDRED,
> },
>
> ```
>
> Here hard code swappiness in [0, 200], and now add a new define.
Yes, MAX_SWAPPINESS is a hard limit. I'm not sure what you're
proposing here - the SYSCTL_ZERO and SYSCTL_TWO_HUNDRED values are a
little different than the defines I added. I think most of the value
is just consistently using the defines in the core mm code.
>
> And many other code hard reference 200 into max value of swappiness, like:
>
> ```
> memcontrol.c:
> static int mem_cgroup_swappiness_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> struct cftype *cft, u64 val)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
>
> if (val > 200)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> memcg->swappiness = val;
> else
> vm_swappiness = val;
>
> return 0;
> }
This one is already fixed in my patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists