[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0e2ad99-e7bc-5670-c2a0-b6bdf4c67eba@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:05:16 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: babu.moger@....com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/24] x86/resctrl: Use __set_bit()/__clear_bit()
instead of open coding
Hi Babu,
On 09/11/2023 20:38, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 10/25/23 13:03, James Morse wrote:
>> The resctrl CLOSID allocator uses a single 32bit word to track which
>> CLOSID are free. The setting and clearing of bits is open coded.
>>
>> A subsequent patch adds closid_allocated(), which adds more open
>> coded bitmaps operations. These will eventually need changing to use
>> the bitops helpers so that a CLOSID bitmap of the correct size can be
>> allocated dynamically.
>>
>> Convert the existing open coded bit manipulations of closid_free_map
>> to use __set_bit() and friends. These don't need to be atomic as this
>> list is protected by the mutex.
> Reviewed-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Thanks!
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists