linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 36/40] ata: pata_ep93xx: remove legacy pinctrl use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231213183349.hdjoxxszrrc4hqrg@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:33:49 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 36/40] ata: pata_ep93xx: remove legacy pinctrl use

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:16:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:20:53AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > Drop legacy acquire/release since we are using pinctrl for this now.
> 
> ...
> 
> > -	if (IS_ERR(drv_data->dma_rx_channel)) {
> > +	if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(drv_data->dma_rx_channel)) {
> 
> This seems incorrect.
> 
> >  		ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->dma_rx_channel);
> >  		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "rx DMA setup failed");
> 
> 		return dev_err_probe(...);
> 
> >  	}
> 
> I think you wanted
> 
> 	ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(drv_data->dma_rx_channel);
> 	if (ret)
> 		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "rx DMA setup failed");

How is that different from

	if (IS_ERR(drv_data->dma_rx_channel))
		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(drv_data->dma_rx_channel), "....");

(which seems to be more idiomatic to me)? While I was involved in
creating PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, I don't particularily like it (today).

Also note that you want a \n at the end of error messages.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)