[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mmx01ow3fN_8uaWFOw1wDZ2DfN2ZgEA5O+412gzeYCCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:43:56 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: Ignore preserve-most functions
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 9:20 PM Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Neither bindgen nor Rust know about the preserve-most calling
> convention, and Clang describes it as unstable. Since we aren't using
> functions with this calling convention from Rust, blocklist them.
>
> These functions are only added to the build when list hardening is
> enabled, which is likely why others didn't notice this yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Applied to `rust-next` (used Markdown for consistency with the other
comments in the file).
Thanks everyone!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists