linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: aim300: add AIM300 AIoT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2c5d7ba-15c0-45ea-ae45-2a6deffde04e@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:01:28 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com,
        Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>,
        Ziyue Zhang <quic_ziyuzhan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: aim300: add AIM300 AIoT



On 12/13/23 15:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/12/2023 11:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,579 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>> +
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
>>> +#include "qcs8550-aim300.dtsi"
>>
>> Which includes sm8550.dtsi thus I think this is compatible with sm8550.
>> You even use sm8550 compatibles here, which is one more hint for that
>> compatibility.
>>
>> We followed this convention for RB5, although not for QRU/QDU1000 boards.
>>
>> Anyway, if you add here new SoC compatible, I would expect to see new
>> SoC DTSI.
>>
>> I don't have in my notes any previous consensus or decision in these
>> matters, so let's discuss now.
>> +CC few Linaro folks
> 
> After some talks, the idea is to create qcs8550.dtsi, which will include
> sm8550.dtsi, and add top level compatible for qcs8550 using sm8550 fallback.
To the board device tree? Otherwise it'll get overwritten.

Konrad