[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231213195743.GA1055303@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:57:43 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
Cc: hongxing.zhu@....com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] PCI: imx6: Add pci host wakeup support on imx
platforms.
Drop period at the end of subject line. It only adds the possibility
of unnecessary line wrapping in git log.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 05:28:47PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> Add pci host wakeup feature for imx platforms.
s/pci/PCI/
s/imx/i.MX/ (based on how nxp.com web pages refer to it)
> Example of configuring the corresponding dts property under the PCI
> node:
> wake-gpios = <&gpio5 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Add newline between paragraphs or wrap into a single paragraph.
> + /* host wakeup support */
> + imx6_pcie->host_wake_irq = -1;
AFAIK, 0 is an invalid IRQ value. So why not drop this assignment
since imx6_pcie->host_wake_irq is 0 by default since it was allocated
with devm_kzalloc(), and test like this elsewhere:
if (imx6_pcie->host_wake_irq) {
enable_irq_wake(imx6_pcie->host_wake_irq)
> + host_wake_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "wake", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(host_wake_gpio))
> + return PTR_ERR(host_wake_gpio);
> +
> + if (host_wake_gpio != NULL) {
if (host_wake_gpio)
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists