[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS3PR01MB65932B78E4262609241101F2BA8DA@OS3PR01MB6593.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:04:07 +0000
From: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Min Li <lnimi@...mail.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v6 1/6] ptp: clockmatrix: support 32-bit address
space
> My reading is that this patch reverses the usage of module and regaddr.
> F.e. the following hunk:
>
> @@ -553,11 +554,11 @@ static int _sync_pll_output(struct idtcm *idtcm,
> val = SYNCTRL1_MASTER_SYNC_RST;
>
> /* Place master sync in reset */
> err = idtcm_write(idtcm, 0, sync_ctrl1, &val, sizeof(val));
> err = idtcm_write(idtcm, sync_ctrl1, 0, &val, sizeof(val));
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> err = idtcm_write(idtcm, 0, sync_ctrl0, &sync_src, sizeof(sync_src));
> err = idtcm_write(idtcm, sync_ctrl0, 0, &sync_src, sizeof(sync_src));
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> If that is really intended I think it needs to be explained, or possibly a
> separate patch.
Hi Simon
sync_ctrl0/1 was meant to be a module and it was in a wrong place. And this patch is just correcting it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists