[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d6cff29-9cda-4501-a29b-48e76fe2a9d8@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:56:02 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/29] selftests/resctrl: Create cache_portion_size()
helper
Hi Ilpo,
On 12/11/2023 4:18 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> +/*
> + * cache_portion_size - Calculate the size of a cache portion
> + * @cache_size: Total cache size in bytes
> + * @portion_mask: Cache portion mask
> + * @full_cache_mask: Full Cache Bit Mask (CBM) for the cache
> + *
> + * Return: The size of the cache portion in bytes.
> + */
> +static inline int cache_portion_size(unsigned long cache_size,
> + unsigned long portion_mask,
> + unsigned long full_cache_mask)
> +{
> + return cache_size * count_bits(portion_mask) / count_bits(full_cache_mask);
> +}
> +
Even after you added the new zero check the static checker I tried
was not able to recognize that this is safe. Could you please add a check
to ensure that there will be no divide-by-zero here?
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists