lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:59:19 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
        Maciej Wieczór-Retman 
        <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/29] selftests/resctrl: Restore the CPU affinity
 after CAT test

Hi Ilpo,

On 12/11/2023 4:18 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> CAT test does not reset the CPU affinity after the benchmark.
> This is relatively harmless as is because CAT test is the last
> benchmark to run, however, more tests may be added later.
> 
> Store the CPU affinity the first time taskset_benchmark() is run and
> add taskset_restore() which the test can call to reset the CPU mask to
> its original value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v3:
> - New patch
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c    | 13 +++++---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h     |  3 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c |  2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index b79916069788..fa95433297c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
>  	char *resctrl_val = param->resctrl_val;
>  	struct perf_event_read pe_read;
>  	struct perf_event_attr pea;
> +	cpu_set_t old_affinity;
>  	unsigned char *buf;
>  	char schemata[64];
>  	int ret, i, pe_fd;
> @@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
>  	bm_pid = getpid();
>  
>  	/* Taskset benchmark to specified cpu */
> -	ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> +	ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no, &old_affinity);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -175,13 +176,15 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
>  	ret = write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(bm_pid, param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
>  				      resctrl_val);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto reset_affinity;
>  
>  	perf_event_attr_initialize(&pea, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES);
>  	perf_event_initialize_read_format(&pe_read);
>  	pe_fd = perf_open(&pea, bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> -	if (pe_fd < 0)
> -		return pe_fd;
> +	if (pe_fd < 0) {
> +		ret = -1;
> +		goto reset_affinity;
> +	}
>  
>  	buf = alloc_buffer(span, 1);
>  	if (!buf) {
> @@ -220,6 +223,8 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
>  	free(buf);
>  pe_close:
>  	close(pe_fd);
> +reset_affinity:
> +	taskset_restore(bm_pid, &old_affinity);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> index da1f1b508aee..da62f4cd5add 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ int umount_resctrlfs(void);
>  int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report);
>  bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(const char *resource, const char *feature);
>  char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str);
> -int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no);
> +int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no, cpu_set_t *old_affinity);
> +int taskset_restore(pid_t bm_pid, cpu_set_t *old_affinity);
>  int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no,
>  		   char *resctrl_val);
>  int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> index d515850cc174..4aed974efa0f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
>  	value.sival_ptr = (void *)benchmark_cmd;
>  
>  	/* Taskset benchmark to specified cpu */
> -	ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> +	ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no, NULL);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out;
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> index dffe42e11c6c..97760fadcddf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> @@ -345,15 +345,25 @@ int get_mask_no_shareable(const char *cache_type, unsigned long *mask)
>  
>  /*
>   * taskset_benchmark - Taskset PID (i.e. benchmark) to a specified cpu
> - * @bm_pid:	PID that should be binded
> - * @cpu_no:	CPU number at which the PID would be binded
> + * @bm_pid:		PID that should be binded
> + * @cpu_no:		CPU number at which the PID would be binded
> + * @old_affinity:	When not NULL, set to old CPU affinity
>   *
>   * Return: 0 on success, < 0 on error.
>   */
> -int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no)
> +int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no, cpu_set_t *old_affinity)
>  {
>  	cpu_set_t my_set;
>  
> +	if (old_affinity) {
> +		CPU_ZERO(old_affinity);
> +		if (sched_getaffinity(bm_pid, sizeof(*old_affinity),
> +				      old_affinity)) {
> +			ksft_perror("Unable to read previous CPU affinity");

"previous" can be confusing here (it is not trying to determine something
from the past but instead the current state). It can just be "Unable to read
CPU affinity"

> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	CPU_ZERO(&my_set);
>  	CPU_SET(cpu_no, &my_set);
>  
> @@ -366,6 +376,23 @@ int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * taskset_restore - Taskset PID to the earlier CPU affinity
> + * @bm_pid:		PID that should be reset
> + * @old_affinity:	The old CPU affinity to restore
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, < 0 on error.
> + */
> +int taskset_restore(pid_t bm_pid, cpu_set_t *old_affinity)
> +{
> +	if (sched_setaffinity(bm_pid, sizeof(*old_affinity), old_affinity)) {
> +		ksft_perror("Unable to restore taskset");

This message is not clear to me. How about "Unable to restore CPU affinity"?

> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * create_grp - Create a group only if one doesn't exist
>   * @grp_name:	Name of the group

Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ