| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <04650d92-fb80-49e2-87b7-4f9dbec922b8@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:59:19 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/29] selftests/resctrl: Restore the CPU affinity
after CAT test
Hi Ilpo,
On 12/11/2023 4:18 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> CAT test does not reset the CPU affinity after the benchmark.
> This is relatively harmless as is because CAT test is the last
> benchmark to run, however, more tests may be added later.
>
> Store the CPU affinity the first time taskset_benchmark() is run and
> add taskset_restore() which the test can call to reset the CPU mask to
> its original value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> v3:
> - New patch
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 13 +++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 3 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> index b79916069788..fa95433297c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
> char *resctrl_val = param->resctrl_val;
> struct perf_event_read pe_read;
> struct perf_event_attr pea;
> + cpu_set_t old_affinity;
> unsigned char *buf;
> char schemata[64];
> int ret, i, pe_fd;
> @@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
> bm_pid = getpid();
>
> /* Taskset benchmark to specified cpu */
> - ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> + ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no, &old_affinity);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -175,13 +176,15 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
> ret = write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(bm_pid, param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
> resctrl_val);
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto reset_affinity;
>
> perf_event_attr_initialize(&pea, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES);
> perf_event_initialize_read_format(&pe_read);
> pe_fd = perf_open(&pea, bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> - if (pe_fd < 0)
> - return pe_fd;
> + if (pe_fd < 0) {
> + ret = -1;
> + goto reset_affinity;
> + }
>
> buf = alloc_buffer(span, 1);
> if (!buf) {
> @@ -220,6 +223,8 @@ static int cat_test(struct resctrl_val_param *param, size_t span, unsigned long
> free(buf);
> pe_close:
> close(pe_fd);
> +reset_affinity:
> + taskset_restore(bm_pid, &old_affinity);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> index da1f1b508aee..da62f4cd5add 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ int umount_resctrlfs(void);
> int validate_bw_report_request(char *bw_report);
> bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(const char *resource, const char *feature);
> char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str);
> -int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no);
> +int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no, cpu_set_t *old_affinity);
> +int taskset_restore(pid_t bm_pid, cpu_set_t *old_affinity);
> int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no,
> char *resctrl_val);
> int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> index d515850cc174..4aed974efa0f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int resctrl_val(const char * const *benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *par
> value.sival_ptr = (void *)benchmark_cmd;
>
> /* Taskset benchmark to specified cpu */
> - ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no);
> + ret = taskset_benchmark(bm_pid, param->cpu_no, NULL);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> index dffe42e11c6c..97760fadcddf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> @@ -345,15 +345,25 @@ int get_mask_no_shareable(const char *cache_type, unsigned long *mask)
>
> /*
> * taskset_benchmark - Taskset PID (i.e. benchmark) to a specified cpu
> - * @bm_pid: PID that should be binded
> - * @cpu_no: CPU number at which the PID would be binded
> + * @bm_pid: PID that should be binded
> + * @cpu_no: CPU number at which the PID would be binded
> + * @old_affinity: When not NULL, set to old CPU affinity
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, < 0 on error.
> */
> -int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no)
> +int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no, cpu_set_t *old_affinity)
> {
> cpu_set_t my_set;
>
> + if (old_affinity) {
> + CPU_ZERO(old_affinity);
> + if (sched_getaffinity(bm_pid, sizeof(*old_affinity),
> + old_affinity)) {
> + ksft_perror("Unable to read previous CPU affinity");
"previous" can be confusing here (it is not trying to determine something
from the past but instead the current state). It can just be "Unable to read
CPU affinity"
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> CPU_ZERO(&my_set);
> CPU_SET(cpu_no, &my_set);
>
> @@ -366,6 +376,23 @@ int taskset_benchmark(pid_t bm_pid, int cpu_no)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * taskset_restore - Taskset PID to the earlier CPU affinity
> + * @bm_pid: PID that should be reset
> + * @old_affinity: The old CPU affinity to restore
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, < 0 on error.
> + */
> +int taskset_restore(pid_t bm_pid, cpu_set_t *old_affinity)
> +{
> + if (sched_setaffinity(bm_pid, sizeof(*old_affinity), old_affinity)) {
> + ksft_perror("Unable to restore taskset");
This message is not clear to me. How about "Unable to restore CPU affinity"?
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * create_grp - Create a group only if one doesn't exist
> * @grp_name: Name of the group
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists