[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c86e5ffb65f07cd3e444038d1f0ed39f0f4130a.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:44:12 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, alexandru.elisei@....com,
anup@...infault.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, atishp@...shpatra.org,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, chenhuacai@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, james.morse@....com,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, maz@...nel.org,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
suzuki.poulose@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from
kvm_vcpu_check_block()
On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 14:31 -0800, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:25 PM Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 07:28 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 8:21 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > Doh. We got the less obvious cases and missed the obvious one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ugh, and we also missed a related mess in kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt(). That
> > > > > thing should really be folded into vmx_has_nested_events().
> > > > >
> > > > > Good gravy. And vmx_interrupt_blocked() does the wrong thing because that
> > > > > specifically checks if L1 interrupts are blocked.
> > > > >
> > > > > Compile tested only, and definitely needs to be chunked into multiple patches,
> > > > > but I think something like this mess?
> > > >
> > > > The proposed patch does not fix the problem. In fact, it messes things
> > > > up so much that I don't get any test results back.
> > >
> > > Drat.
> > >
> > > > Google has an internal K-U-T test that demonstrates the problem. I
> > > > will post it soon.
> > >
> > > Received, I'll dig in soonish, though "soonish" might unfortunately might mean
> > > 2024.
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So this is what I think:
> >
> >
> > KVM does have kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt() for this exact purpose,
> > to check if nested APICv has a pending interrupt before halting.
> >
> >
> > However the problem is bigger - with APICv we have in essence 2 pending interrupt
> > bitmaps - the PIR and the IRR, and to know if the guest has a pending interrupt
> > one has in theory to copy PIR to IRR, then see if the max is larger then the current PPR.
> >
> > Since we don't want to write to guest memory, and the IRR here resides in the guest memory,
> > I guess we have to do a 'dry-run' version of 'vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt' and call
> > it from kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt().
> >
> > What do you think? I can prepare a patch for this.
> >
> > Can you share a reproducer or write a new one that can be shared?
>
> See https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20231211185552.3856862-1-jmattson@google.com/.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim Levitsky
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists