[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXkecmQGYT81R17C@fedora>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:01:06 +0800
From: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@...sion.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stone.xulei@...sion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: tcrypt - add script tcrypt_speed_compare.py
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 01:56:56PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-12-10 at 18:19 +0800, WangJinchao wrote:
> > Create a script for comparing tcrypt speed test logs.
> > The script will systematically analyze differences item
> > by item and provide a summary (average).
> > This tool is useful for evaluating the stability of
> > cryptographic module algorithms and assisting with
> > performance optimization.
>
> I have found that for such comparison, the stability is
> dependent on whether we allow the frequency to
> float or we pin the frequency. So in the past when
> I use tcrypt, sometimes I have
> to pin the frequency of CPU for stable results.
>
> One suggestion I have is for for you to also dump the
> frequency governor and P-state info so we know
> for the runs being compared, whether they are running
> with the same CPU frequency.
>
> Tim
>
Thank you for the feedback. This information is valuable for stability testing
and performance optimization.
However, I am uncertain about how to dump P-state information, or I believe that
the script is unable to do so. The reasons are as follows:
1. The primary purpose of this script is to compare tcrypt logs, and it is
executed after the completion of the tcrypt tests. Consequently, it cannot
dump P-state information during tcrypt's runtime.
2. In virtualized environments, there is no available information in the
`/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq` directory pertaining to P-state details.
Am I correct in my understanding?
I am considering documenting your suggestion in the script's comments.
What are your thoughts?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists