[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231212221010.70c84d2d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 22:10:10 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add size check when printing trace_marker
output
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:44:44 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> If for some reason the trace_marker write does not have a nul byte for the
> string, it will overflow the print:
>
> trace_seq_printf(s, ": %s", field->buf);
>
> The field->buf could be missing the nul byte. To prevent overflow, add the
> max size that the buf can be by using the event size and the field
> location.
>
> int max = iter->ent_size - offsetof(struct print_entry, buf);
>
> trace_seq_printf(s, ": %*s", max, field->buf);
Bah, this needs to be:
trace_seq_printf(s, ": %.*s", max, field->buf);
Note the '.' between % and *. Otherwise it right aligns the output.
This did fail the selftest for trace_printk(), but I modified the new one
to add " *" to accommodate it :-p
Sending out v2.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists