[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231213045705.GC1127@sol.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:57:05 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin.cn@...il.com>
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, zhiguo.niu@...soc.com, ke.wang@...soc.com,
yibin.ding@...soc.com, hongyu.jin@...soc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dm: Support I/O priority for dm_io()
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 07:11:47PM +0800, Hongyu Jin wrote:
> From: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@...soc.com>
>
> Add ioprio field in struct dm_io_region, by this field
> specific I/O priority when call dm_io().
>
> Co-developed-by: Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@...soc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@...soc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@...soc.com>
Is struct dm_io_region really the right place for this? What about
struct dm_io_request? Or a parameter to dm_io().
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists