[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <023b6f8f-301b-a6d0-448b-09a602ba1141@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:15:28 +0800
From: zhaotianrui <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>, maobibo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] KVM: selftests: Add KVM selftests header files
for LoongArch
在 2023/12/13 上午1:18, Sean Christopherson 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, zhaotianrui wrote:
>> Hi, Sean:
>>
>> I want to change the definition of DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM in the common
>> file "memstress.h", like this:
>>
>> /* Default guest test virtual memory offset */
>> +#ifndef DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM
>> #define DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM 0xc0000000
>> +#endif
>>
>> As this address should be re-defined in LoongArch headers.
>
> Why? E.g. is 0xc0000000 unconditionally reserved, not guaranteed to be valid,
> something else?
>
>> So, do you have any suggesstion?
>
> Hmm, I think ideally kvm_util_base.h would define a range of memory that can be
> used by tests for arbitrary data. Multiple tests use 0xc0000000, which is not
> entirely arbitrary, i.e. it doesn't _need_ to be 0xc0000000, but 0xc0000000 is
> convenient because it's 32-bit addressable and doesn't overlap reserved areas in
> other architectures.
>
Thanks for your explanation, and LoongArch want to define
DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM to 0x130000000. As default base address for
application loading is 0x120000000, DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM should be
larger than app loading address, so that PER_VCPU_MEM_SIZE can be large
enough, and kvm selftests app size is smaller than 256M in generic.
Thanks
Tianrui Zhao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists