linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: input: Add TouchNetix axiom touchscreen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231213095948.GD2340704@kb-xps>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:59:48 +0100
From:   Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>,
        catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com,
        mark.satterthwaite@...chnetix.com, bartp@...sheep.co.uk,
        hannah.rossiter@...chnetix.com,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        bsp-development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: input: Add TouchNetix axiom
 touchscreen

Le Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:15:35AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> On 13/12/2023 10:14, Kamel Bouhara wrote:
> > Le Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> >> On 13/12/2023 09:22, Kamel Bouhara wrote:
> >>>> It still brings the type of some fields or the constraints. However need
> >>>> of specifying "poll-interval" already points to missing
> >>>> unevaluatedProperties.
> >>>
> >>> Ok, this wasn't clear for me wether or not I should pick
> >>> unevaluatedProperties
> >>
> >> Yes
> >>
> >>> as I still reference "poll-interval" from the
> >>> input.yaml schema ?
> >>
> >> You should drop it from your binding.
> >
> > The driver use it could you explain why I should drop it ?
>
> Because it comes from input.yaml and you did not add any constraints, so
> poll-interval here is redundant.
>

Ok clear, thanks !

Regards,
--
Kamel Bouhara, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com