| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZXmI9zDW8KlZqQj7@pc636>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:35:35 +0100
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Provide a boot time parameter to control lazy RCU
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:54PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:35 AM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 01:12:52AM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > To allow more flexible arrangements while still provide a single kernel
> > > for distros, provide a boot time parameter to enable/disable lazy RCU.
> > >
> > > Specify:
> > >
> > > rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=[y|1|n|0]
> > >
> > > Which also requires
> > >
> > > rcu_nocbs=all
> > >
> > > at boot time to enable/disable lazy RCU.
> > >
> > > To disable it by default at build time when CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y, the new
> > > CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF can be used.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@...alina.io>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >
> > > * Use module_param() instead of module_param_cb()
> > > * Add new CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF to force default off.
> > > * Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE()
> > >
> > > Tested on qemu only this time with various config/boot configuration to ensure
> > > expected values are in sysfs.
> > >
> > > Did a bunch of build tests against various configs/archs.
> > >
> > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> > > kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > index 65731b060e3f..2f0386a12aa7 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > @@ -5021,6 +5021,11 @@
> > > this kernel boot parameter, forcibly setting it
> > > to zero.
> > >
> > > + rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy= [KNL]
> > > + To save power, batch RCU callbacks and flush after
> > > + delay, memory pressure or callback list growing too
> > > + big.
> > > +
> > > rcuscale.gp_async= [KNL]
> > > Measure performance of asynchronous
> > > grace-period primitives such as call_rcu().
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > index bdd7eadb33d8..e7d2dd267593 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> > > @@ -314,6 +314,19 @@ config RCU_LAZY
> > > To save power, batch RCU callbacks and flush after delay, memory
> > > pressure, or callback list growing too big.
> > >
> > > + Requires rcu_nocbs=all to be set.
> > > +
> > > + Use rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=0 to turn it off at boot time.
> > > +
> > > +config RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF
> > > + bool "Turn RCU lazy invocation off by default"
> > > + depends on RCU_LAZY
> > > + default n
> > > + help
> > > + Allows building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y yet keep it default
> > > + off. Boot time param rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=1 can be used to switch
> > > + it back on.
> > > +
> > > config RCU_DOUBLE_CHECK_CB_TIME
> > > bool "RCU callback-batch backup time check"
> > > depends on RCU_EXPERT
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > index 3ac3c846105f..8b7675624815 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > @@ -2719,6 +2719,9 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> > > +static bool enable_rcu_lazy __read_mostly = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF);
> > > +module_param(enable_rcu_lazy, bool, 0444);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * call_rcu_hurry() - Queue RCU callback for invocation after grace period, and
> > > * flush all lazy callbacks (including the new one) to the main ->cblist while
> > > @@ -2744,6 +2747,8 @@ void call_rcu_hurry(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> > > __call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
> > > +#else
> > > +#define enable_rcu_lazy false
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -2792,7 +2797,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
> > > */
> > > void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> > > {
> > > - __call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
> > > + __call_rcu_common(head, func, enable_rcu_lazy);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
> > >
> > I think, it makes sense. Especially for devices/systems where it is hard
> > to recompile the kernel and deploy it. For example, Google and GKI approach.
>
> My concerns had nothing to do with recompiling the kernel. Passing a
> boot parameter (without a kernel compile) can just as well
> default-disable the feature.
>
> I think what Qais is saying is that passing a boot parameter is itself
> a hassle in Android (something I did not know about) because of GKI
> etc.
>
That is true. Doing:
echo 1 > /sys/.../enable_lazy
is a way how to make it easy and flexible.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists