[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3cc7a9d-d464-48e7-beb7-b90b1abbcfc7@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:57:52 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio: mdio-bcm-unimac: Delay before first poll
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:02:49PM -0800, Justin Chen wrote:
> With a clock interval of 400 nsec and a 64 bit transactions (32 bit
> preamble & 16 bit control & 16 bit data), it is reasonable to assume
> the mdio transaction will take 25.6 usec. Add a 30 usec delay before
> the first poll to reduce the chance of a 1000-2000 usec sleep.
#define MDIO_C45 0
suggests the hardware can do C45? The timing works out different then.
Maybe add a comment by the udelay() that is assumes C22, to give a
clue to somebody who is adding C45 support the delay needs to be
re-evaluated.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists