[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231213112705.GI111411@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:27:05 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between LEDs and NetDev due for the v6.8
merge window:wq
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:53:55 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Soo that it's problematic to also have on net-next? (Sorry for the
> > stupid question)
>
> Unless I pull from Lee the patch would be duplicated, we'd have two
> commits with different hashes and the same diff. And if I pull we'd
> get a lot of netdev-unrelated stuff into net-next:
>
> $ git merge f07894d3b384344c43be1bcf61ef8e2fded0efe5
> Auto-merging drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
> Merge made by the 'ort' strategy.
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev | 39 ++
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-tty | 56 ++
> .../bindings/leds/allwinner,sun50i-a100-ledc.yaml | 137 +++++
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml | 2 +-
> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 21 +
> drivers/leds/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/leds/leds-max5970.c | 109 ++++
> drivers/leds/leds-sun50i-a100.c | 580 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/leds/leds-syscon.c | 3 +-
> drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c | 30 +-
> drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c | 52 +-
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-gpio.c | 26 +-
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 32 +-
> drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-tty.c | 247 +++++++--
> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 28 +-
> include/linux/leds.h | 3 +
> include/linux/tty.h | 1 +
> 17 files changed, 1247 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/allwinner,sun50i-a100-ledc.yaml
> create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-max5970.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-sun50i-a100.c
No, please don't do that. None of the branches I maintain are stable.
It allows me to do things like this:
The following changes since commit b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86:
Linux 6.7-rc1 (2023-11-12 16:19:07 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git ib-leds-netdev-v6.8
for you to fetch changes up to ee8bfb47222a5cc59dee345b7369c5f2068e78cd:
docs: ABI: sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev: Add new modes and entry (2023-12-13 11:24:55 +0000)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Immutable branch between LEDs and NetDev due for the v6.8 merge window
----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Golle (2):
leds: trigger: netdev: Extend speeds up to 10G
docs: ABI: sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev: Add new modes and entry
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/leds.h | 3 ++
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists