[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231213120415.GO1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:04:15 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sanath S <sanaths2@....com>
Cc: Sanath S <Sanath.S@....com>, mario.limonciello@....com,
andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
YehezkelShB@...il.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_reset_ports(),
tb_port_reset() and usb4_port_reset()
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 05:28:12PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
>
> On 12/13/2023 11:29 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:46:34AM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > Introduce the tb_switch_reset_ports() function that resets the
> > > downstream ports of a given switch. This helps us reset the USB4
> > > links created by boot firmware during the init sequence.
> > >
> > > Introduce the tb_port_reset() helper function that resets the
> > > given port.
> > >
> > > Introduce the usb4_port_reset() function that performs the DPR
> > > of a given port. This function follows the CM guide specification 7.3
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sanath S <Sanath.S@....com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h | 2 ++
> > > drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> > > index 44e9b09de47a..ef7ed92fd48e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c
> > > @@ -626,6 +626,19 @@ int tb_port_unlock(struct tb_port *port)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +/**
> > > + * tb_port_reset() - Reset downstream port
> > > + * @port: Port to reset
> > > + *
> > > + * Helps to reconfigure the USB4 link by resetting the downstream port.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int tb_port_reset(struct tb_port *port)
> > > +{
> > > + return usb4_port_reset(port);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int __tb_port_enable(struct tb_port *port, bool enable)
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > > @@ -1547,6 +1560,28 @@ static void tb_dump_switch(const struct tb *tb, const struct tb_switch *sw)
> > > regs->__unknown1, regs->__unknown4);
> > > }
> > > +/**
> > > + * tb_switch_reset_ports() - Reset downstream ports of switch.
> > Drop the '.'
> Ack.
> > > + * @sw: Switch whose ports need to be reset.
> > > + *
> > > + * This is applicable only for USB4 routers.
> > > + * tb_switch_is_usb4() needs to be called before calling this
> > > + * function.
> > This should fit into 2 lines:
> >
> > * This is applicable only for USB4 routers. tb_switch_is_usb4()
> > * needs to be called before calling this function.
> Ack.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> > Specifically returns %-EOPNOTSUPP if the router does not support this
> > (e.g is not USB4 router).
> >
> > > + */
> > > +int tb_switch_reset_ports(struct tb_switch *sw)
> > > +{
> > > + struct tb_port *port;
> > > + int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > Reverse christmas tree:
> >
> > int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > struct tb_port *port;
> Ack.
> > > +
> > > + tb_switch_for_each_port(sw, port) {
> > > + if (tb_port_is_null(port) && port->cap_usb4)
> > > + return tb_port_reset(port);
> > Now you run this only once for the first lane adapter it finds.
> >
> > How much you actually tested this patch series? :(
>
> I've tested this patch on multiple TBT4 docks like OWC, Kenningston and
> Lenovo on
> reboot/suspend-resume/hotplug scenarios.
Did you test so that you had the thing plugged to a second USB4 port of
the host router? I don't think so because the above is only run for the
first port and then it immediately returns so all the other USB4 ports
will not be reset.
> > Since we are already in -rc5 it is unlikely that behavioral changes like
> > this will go to the next release (v6.8-rc1), so you have all that time
> > to make sure your patches work as expected.
> Agreed. Since this is a behavioral change it needs more testing and
> refinement on how
> we can reset the switch and its ports.
> > > + }
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * tb_switch_reset() - reconfigure route, enable and send TB_CFG_PKG_RESET
> > > * @sw: Switch to reset
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> > > index e299e53473ae..f2687ec4ac53 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h
> > > @@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ void tb_switch_remove(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > void tb_switch_suspend(struct tb_switch *sw, bool runtime);
> > > int tb_switch_resume(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > int tb_switch_reset(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > +int tb_switch_reset_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > int tb_switch_wait_for_bit(struct tb_switch *sw, u32 offset, u32 bit,
> > > u32 value, int timeout_msec);
> > > void tb_sw_set_unplugged(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > @@ -1281,6 +1282,7 @@ struct tb_port *usb4_switch_map_usb3_down(struct tb_switch *sw,
> > > int usb4_switch_add_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > void usb4_switch_remove_ports(struct tb_switch *sw);
> > > +int usb4_port_reset(struct tb_port *port);
> > > int usb4_port_unlock(struct tb_port *port);
> > > int usb4_port_hotplug_enable(struct tb_port *port);
> > > int usb4_port_configure(struct tb_port *port);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> > > index 87e4795275fe..d49530bc0d53 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h
> > > @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ struct tb_regs_port_header {
> > > #define PORT_CS_18_CSA BIT(22)
> > > #define PORT_CS_18_TIP BIT(24)
> > > #define PORT_CS_19 0x13
> > > +#define PORT_CS_19_DPR BIT(0)
> > > #define PORT_CS_19_PC BIT(3)
> > > #define PORT_CS_19_PID BIT(4)
> > > #define PORT_CS_19_WOC BIT(16)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> > > index 4277733d0021..c8a4bf33ed1c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c
> > > @@ -1073,6 +1073,45 @@ void usb4_switch_remove_ports(struct tb_switch *sw)
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +/**
> > > + * usb4_port_reset() - Reset USB4 downsteam port
> > > + * @port: USB4 port to reset.
> > > + *
> > > + * Helps to reconfigure USB4 link by resetting downstream port.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: Returns 0 on success or an error code on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +int usb4_port_reset(struct tb_port *port)
> > > +{
> > > + u32 val = 0;
> > This initialization is actually not needed.
> Ack.
> >
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = tb_port_read(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> > > + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + val = val | PORT_CS_19_DPR;
> > val |= PORT_CS_19_DPR;
> >
> > Same as you do below with &= ~..
> Ack.
> >
> > > + ret = tb_port_write(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> > > + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* Wait for 10ms after requesting downstream port reset */
> > > + usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> > > +
> > > + ret = tb_port_read(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> > > + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > Do you really need to read it back from the hardware here?
>
> I don't think it's necessary. But I added this just to be safe if performing
> DPR has
> made changes to other CS_19 bits.
Okay.
> > > +
> > > + val &= ~PORT_CS_19_DPR;
> > > + ret = tb_port_write(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> > > + port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > This can be simply
> >
> > return tb_port_write(port, &val, TB_CFG_PORT,
> > port->cap_usb4 + PORT_CS_19, 1);
> Ack.
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * usb4_port_unlock() - Unlock USB4 downstream port
> > > * @port: USB4 port to unlock
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists