[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gjeiCb9wBjdG+yWp5E_g2SPUMNNf-Stm_xkGau0Cbr2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:46:05 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/core: Check get_temp ops is present when
registering a tz
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:13 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Initially the check against the get_temp ops in the
> thermal_zone_device_update() was put in there in order to catch
> drivers not providing this method.
>
> Instead of checking again and again the function if the ops exists in
> the update function, let's do the check at registration time, so it is
> checked one time and for all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Looks good. Do you want me to pick it up?
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 625ba07cbe2f..964f26e517f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -437,11 +437,6 @@ void __thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> if (atomic_read(&in_suspend))
> return;
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(!tz->ops->get_temp,
> - "'%s' must not be called without 'get_temp' ops set\n",
> - __func__))
> - return;
> -
> if (!thermal_zone_device_is_enabled(tz))
> return;
>
> @@ -1289,7 +1284,7 @@ thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(const char *type, struct thermal_trip *t
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - if (!ops) {
> + if (!ops || !ops->get_temp) {
> pr_err("Thermal zone device ops not defined\n");
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists