linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC v3 18/21] ACPI: processor: Only call arch_unregister_cpu() if HOTPLUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1rDOhH-00DvlO-UP@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:50:43 +0000
From:   Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        x86@...nel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        jianyong.wu@....com, justin.he@....com,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 18/21] ACPI: processor: Only call arch_unregister_cpu()
 if HOTPLUG_CPU is selected

From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>

The kbuild robot points out that configurations without HOTPLUG_CPU
selected can try to build acpi_processor_post_eject() without success
as arch_unregister_cpu() is not defined.

Check this explicitly. This will be merged into:
| ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
for any subsequent posting.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@...amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>
---
This should probably be squashed into an earlier patch.
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 5dabb426481f..ea12e70dfd39 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device)
 	unsigned long long sta;
 	acpi_status status;
 
-	if (!device)
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || !device)
 		return;
 
 	pr = acpi_driver_data(device);
-- 
2.30.2