lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:45:05 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, 13916275206@....com,
        linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        liam.r.girdwood@...el.com, soyer@....hu, tiwai@...e.de,
        peeyush@...com, navada@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: tas2562: remove tas2563 into driver

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 01:08:31PM +0800, Shenghao Ding wrote:
> Remove tas2563 from tas2562, it will be supported in separated driver code.

No objection from the code perspective. The Q is, what is the behaviour of the
current users? Imagine we have a used of this chip and this driver gets it
enumerated. Does it work? if so, this patch can not be applied right now.
Otherwise the commit message above is missing an elaboration of the case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ