linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/zswap: change dstmem size to one page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKEwX=P4=YbvoRCa5+BB+==f4YL_5-6AaUNUCdH3v2faTx-PYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:18:28 -0800
From:   Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To:     Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
        Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
        Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/zswap: change dstmem size to one page

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:34 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:18 PM Chengming Zhou
> <zhouchengming@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Change the dstmem size from 2 * PAGE_SIZE to only one page since
> > we only need at most one page when compress, and the "dlen" is also
> > PAGE_SIZE in acomp_request_set_params(). If the output size > PAGE_SIZE
> > we don't wanna store the output in zswap anyway.
> >
> > So change it to one page, and delete the stale comment.
>
> I couldn't find the history of why we needed 2 * PAGE_SIZE, it would
> be nice if someone has the context, perhaps one of the maintainers.

It'd be very nice indeed.

>
> One potential reason is that we used to store a zswap header
> containing the swap entry in the compressed page for writeback
> purposes, but we don't do that anymore. Maybe we wanted to be able to
> handle the case where an incompressible page would exceed PAGE_SIZE
> because of that?

It could be hmm. I didn't study the old zswap architecture too much,
but it has been 2 * PAGE_SIZE since the time zswap was first merged
last I checked.
I'm not 100% comfortable ACK-ing the undoing of something that looks
so intentional, but FTR, AFAICT, this looks correct to me.