[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXsajZoQRw7HgHl1@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:09:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
brgl@...ev.pl, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] gpiolib: cdev: relocate debounce_period_us from
struct gpio_desc
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:58:11PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
...
> > +/*
> > + * Used to populate gpio_v2_line_info with cdev specific fields not contained
> > + * in the struct gpio_desc.
> > + * A line is determined to contain supplemental information by
> > + * line_is_supplemental().
> > + */
> > +static struct {
> > + /* a rbtree of the struct lines containing the supplemental info */
> > + struct rb_root tree;
> > + /* covers tree */
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > +} supinfo;
Hmm... If I read the kernel-doc script it should support anonymous structs
and unions...
...
> > +static void supinfo_init(void)
> > +{
> > + supinfo.tree = RB_ROOT;
> > + spin_lock_init(&supinfo.lock);
> > +}
>
> Can it be done statically?
>
> supinfo = {
> .tree = RB_ROOT,
> .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(supinfo.lock),
I even checked the current tree, we have 32 users of this pattern in drivers/.
> };
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists