[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d025aeb-7766-4148-b2fd-01ec3653b4a7@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:57:32 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ahelenia Ziemia'nska <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 06/11] net/smc: smc_splice_read: always request
MSG_DONTWAIT
On 12/14/23 3:50 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> Let's figure that out before we get another repost.
>
> I'm just waiting for Jens to review it as he had comments on this
> before.
Well, I do wish the CC list had been setup a bit more deliberately.
Especially as this is a resend, and I didn't even know about any of this
before Christian pointed me this way the other day.
Checking lore, I can't even see all the patches. So while it may be
annoying, I do think it may be a good idea to resend the series so I can
take a closer look as well. I do think it's interesting and I'd love to
have it work in a non-blocking fashion, both solving the issue of splice
holding the pipe lock while doing IO, and also then being able to
eliminate the pipe_clear_nowait() hack hopefully.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists