linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v3 07/21] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231214174337.000042a4@Huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:43:37 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        <jianyong.wu@....com>, <justin.he@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 07/21] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init
 and remove pre-processor guards

On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:49:47 +0000
Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> wrote:

> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> 
> acpi_processor_hotadd_init() will make a CPU present by mapping it
> based on its hardware id.
> 
> 'hotadd_init' is ambiguous once there are two different behaviours
> for cpu hotplug. This is for toggling the _STA present bit. Subsequent
> patches will add support for toggling the _STA enabled bit, named
> acpi_processor_make_enabled().
> 
> Rename it acpi_processor_make_present() to make it clear this is
> for CPUs that were not previously present.
> 
> Expose the function prototypes it uses to allow the preprocessor
> guards to be removed. The IS_ENABLED() check will let the compiler
> dead-code elimination pass remove this if it isn't going to be
> used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
> Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@...amperecomputing.com>
> Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>
> ---
> Outstanding comments:
>  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914151720.00007105@Huawei.com

If it's not caused a build warning yet, chances are high this is fine.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

>  https://lore.kernel.org/r/b8f430c1-c30f-191f-18c6-f750fa6ba476@redhat.com
>   For this comment, we use IS_ENABLED() in multiple places in the kernel in
>   this way, and it isn't a problem.
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 +++++---------
>  include/linux/acpi.h          |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index c8e960ff0aca..26e3efb74614 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -183,13 +183,15 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
>  
>  /* Initialization */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU
> -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long sta;
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> @@ -223,12 +225,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  	cpu_maps_update_done();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> -#else
> -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> -	return -ENODEV;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU */
>  
>  static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
> @@ -335,7 +331,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	 *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
>  	 */
>  	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
> -		int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
> +		int ret = acpi_processor_make_present(pr);
>  
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 36071bc11acd..19d009ca9e7a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -301,12 +301,10 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(acpi_handle handle, u32 cpu,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU
>  /* Arch dependent functions for cpu hotplug support */
>  int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id,
>  		 int *pcpu);
>  int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_IOAPIC
>  int acpi_get_ioapic_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base, u64 *phys_addr);