[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da48d207-da8e-4085-940d-54a0dfec1c9f@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:52:29 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
<carl@...amperecomputing.com>, <lcherian@...vell.com>,
<bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>, <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>,
<dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/24] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to
sleep
Hi James,
On 12/14/2023 3:37 AM, James Morse wrote:
> On 09/11/2023 17:47, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 10/25/2023 11:03 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>
>>> No changes since v6
>>
>> If I trusted this I would not have taken the time to review this patch.
>
> I'm not sure what you want me to do from this comment ... but this 'no changes' annotation
> doesn't work for either of us, so I'll remove them.
>
The "no changes" annotation is valuable when it is accurate. When the patch
explicitly claims to have no changes since previous version when in fact there
are changes then it complicates the review process.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists