| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <024c755b-2957-40eb-b8aa-a69236ef512f@vivo.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:05:00 +0800
From: Huan Yang <11133793@...o.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com, cuibixuan@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 2/2] mm: vmscan: add new event to trace shrink
lru
在 2023/12/14 9:34, Bixuan Cui 写道:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from cuibixuan@...o.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> From: cuibixuan <cuibixuan@...o.com>
>
> Add a new event to calculate the shrink_inactive_list()/shrink_active_list()
> execution time.
>
> Example of output:
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353020: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start: nid=0
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end: nid=0 nr_taken=32 nr_active=0 nr_deactivated=32 nr_referenced=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353040: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=32 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_ANON|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353094: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start: nid=0
> kswapd0-103 [007] ..... 1098.353162: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end: nid=0 nr_scanned=32 nr_reclaimed=21 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0 nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0 nr_ref_keep=11 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=6 flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
>
> Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...o.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> mm/vmscan.c | 11 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> index b99cd28c9815..02868bdc5999 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
> @@ -395,7 +395,24 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio,
> show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
> );
>
> -TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive,
> +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int nid),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(nid),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(int, nid)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->nid = nid;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("nid=%d", __entry->nid)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end,
>
> TP_PROTO(int nid,
> unsigned long nr_scanned, unsigned long nr_reclaimed,
> @@ -446,7 +463,24 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive,
> show_reclaim_flags(__entry->reclaim_flags))
> );
>
> -TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
> +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int nid),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(nid),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(int, nid)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->nid = nid;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("nid=%d", __entry->nid)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end,
>
> TP_PROTO(int nid, unsigned long nr_taken,
> unsigned long nr_active, unsigned long nr_deactivated,
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 4e3b835c6b4a..a44d9624d60f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1906,6 +1906,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
> bool stalled = false;
>
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start(pgdat->node_id);
Can here add memcg id into shrink trace?
If so, we can attach this trace and collect shrink info into both NODE
and each MEMCG.
> +
> while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(pgdat, file, sc))) {
> if (stalled)
> return 0;
> @@ -1990,7 +1992,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> if (file)
> sc->nr.file_taken += nr_taken;
>
> - trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id,
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end(pgdat->node_id,
> nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, file);
> return nr_reclaimed;
> }
> @@ -2028,6 +2030,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
>
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_start(pgdat->node_id);
> +
> lru_add_drain();
>
> spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> @@ -2107,7 +2111,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> lru_note_cost(lruvec, file, 0, nr_rotated);
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&l_active);
> free_unref_page_list(&l_active);
> - trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active_end(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
> nr_deactivate, nr_rotated, sc->priority, file);
> }
>
> @@ -4524,9 +4528,10 @@ static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swap
> if (list_empty(&list))
> return scanned;
> retry:
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_start(pgdat->node_id);
> reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false);
> sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
> - trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id,
> + trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive_end(pgdat->node_id,
> scanned, reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority,
> type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists