linux-kernel - Re: pm.c:undefined reference to `i8042

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <374978b4-9bed-4d5c-90e2-344e46dedaf8@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 19:54:18 +0000
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
 "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>, "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>,
 "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
 "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pm.c:undefined reference to `i8042_command'

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 01:21, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> 在2023年12月6日十二月 下午5:26，Randy Dunlap写道：
>> On 12/5/23 22:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023, at 06:24, Randy Dunlap wrote:

>>> I think it's bad style to force-select an optional subsystem.
>>> How about making the entire file optional? It seems that there
>>> are already __weak functions in its place.
>>
>> Yes, I agree in general.
>>
>> Hopefully the maintainer will opine your suggestion.
>> Jiaxun?
>
> LGTM, PM is not an essential function here.
> Arnd, do you mind making it a patch?
>

I just tried it out and my version doesn't actually work since
we still end up building the file with SERIO_I82042=m.

We could still make it work by checking for serio being
built-in here, but in the end I think that's worse than
Randy's patch, so let's just go with his original version.

      Arnd