[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jzpgo5f3.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:11:44 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, "jsperbeck@...gle.com"
<jsperbeck@...gle.com>, "tip-bot2@...utronix.de" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "andres@...razel.de" <andres@...razel.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/acpi: Ignore invalid x2APIC entries
On Thu, Dec 14 2023 at 15:00, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 15:51 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The topology evaluation rework gets rid of this return value
>> completely,
>> so I really don't want to add an dependency on it.
>
> Great to know that the topology evaluation rework is still in your
> plan. We have tested the latest version and it indeed solves some real
> issues we observed, and I'm willing to test if we have a new version
> posted.
If I ever get a breather :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists