[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231214062434.3565630-3-menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:24:34 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: activate the OP_NE login in range_cond()
The edge range checking for the registers is supported by the verifier
now, so we can activate the extended login in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c/range_cond() to test
such logic.
Besides, I added some cases to the "crafted_cases" array for this logic.
These cases are mainly used to test the edge of the src reg and dst reg.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
---
v2:
- add some cases to the "crafted_cases"
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c
index 0c9abd279e18..53b8711cfd2d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c
@@ -590,12 +590,7 @@ static void range_cond(enum num_t t, struct range x, struct range y,
*newy = range(t, max_t(t, x.a, y.a), min_t(t, x.b, y.b));
break;
case OP_NE:
- /* generic case, can't derive more information */
- *newx = range(t, x.a, x.b);
- *newy = range(t, y.a, y.b);
- break;
-
- /* below extended logic is not supported by verifier just yet */
+ /* below logic is supported by the verifier now */
if (x.a == x.b && x.a == y.a) {
/* X is a constant matching left side of Y */
*newx = range(t, x.a, x.b);
@@ -2101,6 +2096,24 @@ static struct subtest_case crafted_cases[] = {
{S32, S64, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)-255}, {(u32)(s32)-2, 0}},
{S32, S64, {0, 1}, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}},
{S32, U32, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}, {(u32)(s32)S32_MIN, (u32)(s32)S32_MIN}},
+
+ /* edge overlap testings for BPF_NE */
+ {U64, U64, {1, 1}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S64, {1, 1}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, U32, {1, 1}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S32, {1, 1}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, U64, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S64, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, U32, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S32, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}, {1, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, U64, {1, 0x80000000}, {1, 1}},
+ {U64, S64, {1, 0x80000000}, {1, 1}},
+ {U64, U32, {1, 0x80000000}, {1, 1}},
+ {U64, S32, {1, 0x80000000}, {1, 1}},
+ {U64, U64, {1, 0x80000000}, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S64, {1, 0x80000000}, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, U32, {1, 0x80000000}, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}},
+ {U64, S32, {1, 0x80000000}, {0x80000000, 0x80000000}},
};
/* Go over crafted hard-coded cases. This is fast, so we do it as part of
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists