| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231214073242.GT1074920@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:32:42 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sanath S <sanaths2@....com>
Cc: Sanath S <Sanath.S@....com>, mario.limonciello@....com,
andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
YehezkelShB@...il.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset
downstream ports created by boot firmware
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:50:21PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2023 12:37 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:08:34PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > On 12/13/2023 5:22 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 04:04:57PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > > > On 12/13/2023 11:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:18:06AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:49:14AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:46:35AM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Boot firmware might have created tunnels of its own. Since we cannot
> > > > > > > > > be sure they are usable for us. Tear them down and reset the ports
> > > > > > > > > to handle it as a new hotplug for USB3 routers.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sanath S <Sanath.S@....com>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> > > > > > > > > index fd49f86e0353..febd0b6972e3 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -2598,6 +2598,17 @@ static int tb_start(struct tb *tb)
> > > > > > > > > tb_switch_tmu_enable(tb->root_switch);
> > > > > > > > > /* Full scan to discover devices added before the driver was loaded. */
> > > > > > > > > tb_scan_switch(tb->root_switch);
> > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > + * Boot firmware might have created tunnels of its own. Since we cannot
> > > > > > > > > + * be sure they are usable for us, Tear them down and reset the ports
> > > > > > > > > + * to handle it as new hotplug for USB4 routers.
> > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > + if (tb_switch_is_usb4(tb->root_switch)) {
> > > > > > > > > + tb_switch_discover_tunnels(tb->root_switch,
> > > > > > > > > + &tcm->tunnel_list, false);
> > > > > > > > Why this is needed?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It should be enough, to do simply something like this:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if (tb_switch_is_usb4(tb->root_switch))
> > > > > > > > tb_switch_reset(tb->root_switch);
> > > > > If we don't tear down of tunnels before performing the DPR, the PCIe
> > > > > enumeration is failing.
> > > > >
> > > > > PCIe link is not coming up after DPR. Below log is missing without
> > > > > performing path
> > > > > deactivation before performing DPR and hence PCIe enumeration is not
> > > > > initiated.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 746.630865] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
> > > > > [ 746.630885] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
> > > > >
> > > > > I think when we do a DPR, it internally does some handling with PCI Path
> > > > > Enable bit(PE).
> > > > > So, deactivation of PCIe path is necessary for DPR to work.
> > > > Rigth, it should be enough to reset the protocol adapter config and path
> > > > config spaces. I guess using discovery at this point is fine too but I
> > > > would at least check how complex doing the minimal "reset" turns out.
> > > >
> > > > I mean in tb_switch_reset() for USB4 v1 routers it can go over all the
> > > > adapters and perform "cleanup" or so.
> > > I gave it a thought yesterday and we can do something like this:
> > >
> > > We are already doing tb_discovery(tb) in tb_start. This would
> > > discover the path configuration done by Boot firmware.
> > >
> > > Now, we can place the tb_switch_reset() right below that api with
> > > conditions suggested by you.
> > >
> > > And tb_switch_reset() would internally DPR for all down steam ports.
> > >
> > > It can look something like below:
> > >
> > > /* Find out tunnels created by the boot firmware */
> > > tb_discover_tunnels(tb);
> > > /*
> > > * Reset USB4 v1 host router to get rid of possible tunnels the
> > > * boot firmware created. This makes sure all the tunnels are
> > > * created by us and thus have known configuration.
> > > *
> > > * For USB4 v2 and beyond we do this in nhi_reset() using the
> > > * host router reset interface.
> > > */
> > > if (host_reset && usb4_switch_version(tb->root_switch) == 1)
> > > tb_switch_reset(tb->root_switch);
> > >
> > > With this, we are making sure while we get a unplug event after doing a DPR,
> > > We are clearing all the paths established by Boot firmware. This wouldn't be
> > > possible
> > > if we had not discovered the paths before we perform DPR.
> > >
> > > It would create inconsistency for a new hot plug if we have not cleared the
> > > path configurations
> > > of previous hot unplug events.
> > Right. I would still check if doing protocol adapter "reset" + path
> > config space clear in tb_switch_reset() is enough and how complex that
> > ends up to be. I think that's all what is needed.
> >
> > If it turns out too complex, yes I guess something like this:
> >
> > /* Find out tunnels created by the boot firmware */
> > tb_discover_tunnels(tb);
> > /* Add DP resources from the DP tunnels created by the boot firmware */
> > tb_discover_dp_resources(tb);
> >
> > if (host_reset && usb4_switch_version(tb->root_switch) == 1) {
> > struct tb_tunnel *n, *tunnel;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(tunnel, n, &tcm->tunnel_list, list)
> > tb_deactivate_and_free_tunnel(tunnel);
> >
> > tb_switch_reset(tb->root_switch);
> > }
> >
> > With proper comments would work, no?
> Yes, this works. Tested it too and works fine.
Cool.
> Probably we can move tb_deactivate_and_free_tunnel() inside
> tb_switch_reset() to make it
> look better.
Unfortunately that's not possible because tb_switch_reset() lives in
switch.s (and should live there) and tb_deactivate_and_free_tunnel() is
part of tb.c (as should be). This is actually why I would like to try
the "reset" protocol adapters + their path config spaces in
tb_switch_reset() as then that would work with any router and does not
need to have any knowledge about tunnels or tb.c internals.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists