[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5625051-e9e2-4a75-a11a-cf5b40606fa4@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:55:34 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
        Paul Barker <paul.barker@...cloud.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] arm: arm64: dts: Enable cros-ec-spi as wake source
Il 13/12/23 19:00, Mark Hasemeyer ha scritto:
> The cros_ec driver currently assumes that cros-ec-spi compatible device
> nodes are a wakeup-source even though the wakeup-source property is not
> defined.
> 
> Add the wakeup-source property to all cros-ec-spi compatible device
> nodes to match expected behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
I received only patch [2/6] - please send the entire series to the relevant
maintainers, as otherwise it's difficult to understand what's going on.
As for this patch alone:
  1. arch/arm stuff goes to a different commit
  2. I would prefer if you split per-arch and per-SoC.
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists