linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/rockchip: inno

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <k7ry5xsrmc5bi46pwbkphq4wo3jd5uutnezvttue2eh7sabkby@wvimbjamzg32>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:40:16 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To:     Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
Cc:     Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Add basic mode validation

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:17:39PM +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Am 14.12.23 um 09:05 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:51:21PM +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > As per TRM this controller supports pixelclocks starting from 25 MHz. The
> > > maximum supported pixelclocks are defined by the phy configurations we
> > > have. Also it can't support modes that require doubled clocks.
> > > If there is a phy reference clock we can additionally validate against
> > > VESA DMT's recommendations.
> > > Those checks are added to the mode_valid hook of the connector and
> > > encoder's mode_fixup hook.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
> > > index f7f0bec725f9..2f839ff31c1c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct inno_hdmi_variant {
> > >   	struct inno_hdmi_phy_config *default_phy_config;
> > >   };
> > > +#define INNO_HDMI_MIN_TMDS_CLOCK  25000000U
> > > +
> > >   struct hdmi_data_info {
> > >   	int vic;
> > >   	bool sink_has_audio;
> > > @@ -572,6 +574,34 @@ static int inno_hdmi_setup(struct inno_hdmi *hdmi,
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > > +static enum drm_mode_status inno_hdmi_mode_valid(struct inno_hdmi *hdmi,
> > > +						 struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > > +{
> > So, mode_valid is only called to filter out the modes retrieved by
> > get_modes, but it won't be called when userspace programs a mode. That's
> > atomic_check's job.
> > 
> > So you probably want to create a shared function between atomic_check
> > and mode_valid, and call it from both places (or call mode_valid from
> > atomic_check).
>
> This actually _is_ a shared function called in
> inno_hdmi_connector_mode_valid and inno_hdmi_encoder_mode_fixup. Yes, I 
> probably should use it in atomic_check _also_.

Yeah, I saw that later and forgot to rephrase.

> > > +	/* No support for double-clock modes */
> > > +	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
> > > +		return MODE_BAD;
> > > +
> > > +	unsigned int mpixelclk = mode->clock * 1000;
> > Variables should be declared at the top of the function.
> Oookay ... can move them.
> > > +	if (mpixelclk < INNO_HDMI_MIN_TMDS_CLOCK)
> > > +		return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
> > You probably want to check the max TMDS clock too?
>
> Not sure what you mean here. For the currently supported formats of this
> driver (rgb only) tmds clock and pixel clock are always the same.

I mean that your controller has a maximum TMDS rate it supports too
(probably something like 340MHz). You should also filter out the modes
that have a pixel clock higher than the one you can reach.

> > > @@ -602,7 +632,9 @@ static bool inno_hdmi_encoder_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> > >   					 const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > >   					 struct drm_display_mode *adj_mode)
> > >   {
> > > -	return true;
> > > +	struct inno_hdmi *hdmi = encoder_to_inno_hdmi(encoder);
> > > +
> > > +	return inno_hdmi_mode_valid(hdmi, adj_mode) == MODE_OK;
> > >   }
> > Why do you call mode_valid in mode_fixup?
> 
> I'm calling the shared function you asked me to introduce
> (inno_hdmi_connector_mode_valid != inno_mode_valid)

That's the mode_fixup part that I'm focused on :)

mode_fixup is the legacy function to adjust the mode to the controller
capabilities. It's optional, and you're not adjusting anything here,
just testing the same thing mode_valid did.

mode_valid has been superseeded by atomic_check anyway, so just drop
mode_valid and use your function in atomic_check like we discussed.

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)