[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be8a2a6a965f4dfca61febdaff556e63@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:47:49 +0000
From: JustinLai0215 <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v14 08/13] rtase: Implement net_device_ops
>
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 17:47 +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> > +static netdev_features_t rtase_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
> > + netdev_features_t
> features)
> > +{
> > + netdev_features_t features_fix = features;
> > +
> > + if (dev->mtu > MSS_MAX)
> > + features_fix &= ~NETIF_F_ALL_TSO;
> > +
> > + if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> > + features_fix &= ~NETIF_F_ALL_TSO;
>
> This latter condition is strictly more restrictive than the previous one, you can
> drop the latter. Also could you please drop a note about the why of it?
We don't support TSO for jumbo frames, so I will remove the MSS_MAX part.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists