[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f67b29c-e7ff-4ce9-96ce-aa552d6d926c@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:20:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andi.shyti@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
tomasz.figa@...il.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com, arnd@...db.de,
semen.protsenko@...aro.org
Cc: andre.draszik@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
willmcvicker@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: defconfig: make at24 eeprom builtin
On 14/12/2023 11:52, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> gs101-oriole populates an at24 eeprom on the battery connector.
> Make EEPROM_AT24 builtin.
The first sentence does not explain me the second part. The first
sentence justifies having this enabled in general, but not necessarily
as built-in.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists