linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in pmu_event_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b1c4163-31e8-490e-9f19-3abceeeb2d7d@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:52:49 +0100
From:   Eric Auger <eauger@...hat.com>
To:     Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test
 in pmu_event_filter_test

Hi Shaoqin

On 11/29/23 08:27, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> Add the invalid filter test to double check if the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
> will return the expected error.
... in which situations? filter beyond the 16b event space or incorrect
action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c       | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> index 0e652fbdb37a..4c375417b194 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   * This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
>   * sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
>   * can't use those events which user deny.
> + * It also checks that setting invalid filter ranges return the expected error.
>   * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
>   * is supported on the host.
>   */
> @@ -197,6 +198,39 @@ static void for_each_test(void)
>  		run_test(t);
>  }
>  
> +static void set_invalid_filter(struct vpmu_vm *vm, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter invalid;
> +	struct kvm_device_attr attr = {
> +		.group	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> +		.attr	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER,
> +		.addr	= (uint64_t)&invalid,
> +	};
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* The max event number is (1 << 16), set a range large than it. */
larger
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(BIT(15), BIT(15)+1, 0);
doc says
must fit within the event space defined by the PMU
architecture (10 bits on ARMv8.0, 16 bits from ARMv8.1 onwards).

> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter range "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* Set the Invalid action. */
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(0, 1, 3);
> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter action "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_filter(void)
> +{
> +	vpmu_vm = __create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, set_invalid_filter, NULL);
> +	destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
> +}
> +
>  static bool kvm_supports_pmu_event_filter(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -228,4 +262,6 @@ int main(void)
>  	TEST_REQUIRE(host_pmu_supports_events());
>  
>  	for_each_test();
> +
> +	test_invalid_filter();
>  }

Eric