[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231215161157.00000630@Huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:11:57 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>, Salil Mehta
<salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>, <justin.he@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/21] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject()
to use IS_ENABLED()
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:49:57 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Rather than ifdef'ing acpi_processor_post_eject() and its use site, use
> IS_ENABLED() to increase compile coverage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists