[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b79dcf75-c9e8-490e-644f-3b97d95f7397@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 19:45:32 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>, Chia-I Wu
<olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: add definition for venus capset
On 11/19/23 06:46, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 9/21/23 00:16, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 9/15/23 13:59, Huang Rui wrote:
>>> This definition is used fro qemu, and qemu imports this marco in the
>>> headers to enable venus for virtio gpu. So it should add it even kernel
>>> doesn't use this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We would like to add a new definition for venus capset, it will be used for
>>> qemu. Please see details on below discussion:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/b82982aa-5b9e-481e-9491-b9313877bcaa@daynix.com/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
>>> index f556fde07b76..0e21f3998108 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
>>> @@ -309,6 +309,8 @@ struct virtio_gpu_cmd_submit {
>>>
>>> #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_VIRGL 1
>>> #define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_VIRGL2 2
>>> +/* 3 is reserved for gfxstream */
>>> +#define VIRTIO_GPU_CAPSET_VENUS 4
>>
>> Could you please add all other capsets, so we won't needed to do it
>> again in the future
>
> I've opened request to update virtio-spec with the corrected/updated
> capsets https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/182. I'm
> expecting that it will take some time until spec change will be merged
> and now leaning to apply this v1 patch to not hold the Venus work.
>
> Gerd, do you have objections? R-b/ack?
Applied patch to misc-next with edited commit message. Updating spec
taking much time, not worth to hold this change longer. We'll add the
rest of capsets later on. Thanks, Rui!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists