linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] entry: inline syscall enter/exit functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ttojmgkn.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:06:00 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Andy Lutomirski
 <luto@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens
 <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] entry: inline syscall enter/exit functions

On Thu, Dec 14 2023 at 09:24, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>>> so the time required for one syscall dropped from 94.8ns to
>>> 84.7ns, which is a drop of about 11%.
>>
>> That is obviously very nice, and I don't immediately see anything wrong
>> with moving the lot to header based inlines.
>>
>> Thomas?

No objections in principle. Let me look at the lot