[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231215221636.105680-29-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:16:22 -0800
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com,
paul@...l-moore.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com,
keescook@...omium.org,
john.johansen@...onical.com,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mic@...ikod.net
Subject: [PATCH v39 28/42] LSM: Improve logic in security_getprocattr
The conditional in security_getprocattr() can be simplified
and made clearer. This change does that.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
---
security/security.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 8ff6cef26e6c..f2ef6032a925 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -4107,11 +4107,10 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, int lsmid, const char *name,
{
struct security_hook_list *hp;
- hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list) {
- if (lsmid != 0 && lsmid != hp->lsmid->id)
- continue;
- return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
- }
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.getprocattr, list)
+ if (lsmid == LSM_ID_UNDEF || lsmid == hp->lsmid->id)
+ return hp->hook.getprocattr(p, name, value);
+
return LSM_RET_DEFAULT(getprocattr);
}
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists