linux-kernel - Re: [Bug Report] bpf: incorrectly pruning runtime execution path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 02:49:51 +0200
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
 <daniel@...earbox.net>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing
 List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] bpf: incorrectly pruning runtime execution path

On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 16:06 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> If you agree with the analysis, we can start discussing what's the
> best way to fix this.

Ok, yeap, I agree with you. 
Backtracker marks both registers in 'if' statement if one of them is
tracked, but r8 is not marked at block entry and we miss r0.