| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <941c2269-98f0-43a7-a516-cb5b4909ae7f@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:26:32 +0800
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Matthew
Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ryan
Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/39] mm/rmap: introduce
folio_add_anon_rmap_[pte|ptes|pmd]()
On 12/11/2023 11:56 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's mimic what we did with folio_add_file_rmap_*() so we can similarly
> replace page_add_anon_rmap() next.
>
> Make the compiler always special-case on the granularity by using
> __always_inline.
>
> Note that the new functions ignore the RMAP_COMPOUND flag, which we will
> remove as soon as page_add_anon_rmap() is gone.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
With a small question below.
> ---
> include/linux/rmap.h | 6 +++
> mm/rmap.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
> index 7198905dc8be..3b5357cb1c09 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,12 @@ static inline void __folio_rmap_sanity_checks(struct folio *folio,
> * rmap interfaces called when adding or removing pte of page
> */
> void folio_move_anon_rmap(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
> +void folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(struct folio *, struct page *, int nr_pages,
> + struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long address, rmap_t flags);
> +#define folio_add_anon_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma, address, flags) \
> + folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page, 1, vma, address, flags)
> +void folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd(struct folio *, struct page *,
> + struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long address, rmap_t flags);
> void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
> unsigned long address, rmap_t flags);
> void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *,
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index c5761986a411..7787499fa2ad 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1300,38 +1300,20 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address, rmap_t flags)
> {
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> - atomic_t *mapped = &folio->_nr_pages_mapped;
> - int nr = 0, nr_pmdmapped = 0;
> - bool compound = flags & RMAP_COMPOUND;
> - bool first;
>
> - /* Is page being mapped by PTE? Is this its first map to be added? */
> - if (likely(!compound)) {
> - first = atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount);
> - nr = first;
> - if (first && folio_test_large(folio)) {
> - nr = atomic_inc_return_relaxed(mapped);
> - nr = (nr < COMPOUND_MAPPED);
> - }
> - } else if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
> - /* That test is redundant: it's for safety or to optimize out */
> + if (likely(!(flags & RMAP_COMPOUND)))
> + folio_add_anon_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma, address, flags);
> + else
> + folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma, address, flags);
> +}
>
> - first = atomic_inc_and_test(&folio->_entire_mapcount);
> - if (first) {
> - nr = atomic_add_return_relaxed(COMPOUND_MAPPED, mapped);
> - if (likely(nr < COMPOUND_MAPPED + COMPOUND_MAPPED)) {
> - nr_pmdmapped = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> - nr = nr_pmdmapped - (nr & FOLIO_PAGES_MAPPED);
> - /* Raced ahead of a remove and another add? */
> - if (unlikely(nr < 0))
> - nr = 0;
> - } else {
> - /* Raced ahead of a remove of COMPOUND_MAPPED */
> - nr = 0;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> +static __always_inline void __folio_add_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio,
> + struct page *page, int nr_pages, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address, rmap_t flags, enum rmap_mode mode)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, nr, nr_pmdmapped = 0;
>
> + nr = __folio_add_rmap(folio, page, nr_pages, mode, &nr_pmdmapped);
> if (nr_pmdmapped)
> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ANON_THPS, nr_pmdmapped);
> if (nr)
> @@ -1345,18 +1327,34 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * folio->index right when not given the address of the head
> * page.
> */
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) && !compound, folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) &&
> + mode != RMAP_MODE_PMD, folio);
> __folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address,
> !!(flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE));
> } else if (likely(!folio_test_ksm(folio))) {
> __page_check_anon_rmap(folio, page, vma, address);
> }
> - if (flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE)
> - SetPageAnonExclusive(page);
> - /* While PTE-mapping a THP we have a PMD and a PTE mapping. */
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO((atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) > 0 ||
> - (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_entire_mapcount(folio) > 1)) &&
> - PageAnonExclusive(page), folio);
> +
> + if (flags & RMAP_EXCLUSIVE) {
> + switch (mode) {
> + case RMAP_MODE_PTE:
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
> + SetPageAnonExclusive(page + i);
> + break;
> + case RMAP_MODE_PMD:
> + SetPageAnonExclusive(page);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> + struct page *cur_page = page + i;
> +
> + /* While PTE-mapping a THP we have a PMD and a PTE mapping. */
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO((atomic_read(&cur_page->_mapcount) > 0 ||
> + (folio_test_large(folio) &&
> + folio_entire_mapcount(folio) > 1)) &&
> + PageAnonExclusive(cur_page), folio);
> + }
This change will iterate all pages for PMD case. The original behavior
didn't check all pages. Is this change by purpose? Thanks.
>
> /*
> * For large folio, only mlock it if it's fully mapped to VMA. It's
> @@ -1368,6 +1366,54 @@ void page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes - add PTE mappings to a page range of an anon folio
> + * @folio: The folio to add the mappings to
> + * @page: The first page to add
> + * @nr_pages: The number of pages which will be mapped
> + * @vma: The vm area in which the mappings are added
> + * @address: The user virtual address of the first page to map
> + * @flags: The rmap flags
> + *
> + * The page range of folio is defined by [first_page, first_page + nr_pages)
> + *
> + * The caller needs to hold the page table lock, and the page must be locked in
> + * the anon_vma case: to serialize mapping,index checking after setting,
> + * and to ensure that an anon folio is not being upgraded racily to a KSM folio
> + * (but KSM folios are never downgraded).
> + */
> +void folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
> + int nr_pages, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> + rmap_t flags)
> +{
> + __folio_add_anon_rmap(folio, page, nr_pages, vma, address, flags,
> + RMAP_MODE_PTE);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd - add a PMD mapping to a page range of an anon folio
> + * @folio: The folio to add the mapping to
> + * @page: The first page to add
> + * @vma: The vm area in which the mapping is added
> + * @address: The user virtual address of the first page to map
> + * @flags: The rmap flags
> + *
> + * The page range of folio is defined by [first_page, first_page + HPAGE_PMD_NR)
> + *
> + * The caller needs to hold the page table lock, and the page must be locked in
> + * the anon_vma case: to serialize mapping,index checking after setting.
> + */
> +void folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, rmap_t flags)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> + __folio_add_anon_rmap(folio, page, HPAGE_PMD_NR, vma, address, flags,
> + RMAP_MODE_PMD);
> +#else
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> /**
> * folio_add_new_anon_rmap - Add mapping to a new anonymous folio.
> * @folio: The folio to add the mapping to.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists