linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231215155300.21186-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:52:59 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: rename static functions that are called with the lock taken

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Rename two functions that read or modify the global GPIO device list but
don't take the lock themselves (and need to be called with it already
acquired). Use the _unlocked() suffix which seems to be used quite
consistently across the kernel despite there also existing the _locked()
suffix for the same purpose.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 6efe44570333..5b744d1f31f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpio_device_get_chip(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_get_chip);
 
 /* dynamic allocation of GPIOs, e.g. on a hotplugged device */
-static int gpiochip_find_base(int ngpio)
+static int gpiochip_find_base_unlocked(int ngpio)
 {
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 	int base = GPIO_DYNAMIC_BASE;
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_direction);
  * Return -EBUSY if the new chip overlaps with some other chip's integer
  * space.
  */
-static int gpiodev_add_to_list(struct gpio_device *gdev)
+static int gpiodev_add_to_list_unlocked(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 {
 	struct gpio_device *prev, *next;
 
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	 */
 	base = gc->base;
 	if (base < 0) {
-		base = gpiochip_find_base(gc->ngpio);
+		base = gpiochip_find_base_unlocked(gc->ngpio);
 		if (base < 0) {
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
 			ret = base;
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	}
 	gdev->base = base;
 
-	ret = gpiodev_add_to_list(gdev);
+	ret = gpiodev_add_to_list_unlocked(gdev);
 	if (ret) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
 		chip_err(gc, "GPIO integer space overlap, cannot add chip\n");
-- 
2.40.1